Thursday, April 2, 2026

Speaking in Tongues: real, fake...or Misunderstood

Today we’re going to consider something that’s deeply personal to me, also widely discussed and sometimes misunderstood…that is "speaking in tongues."

If you’ve ever been part of a Pentecostal or charismatic church—or maybe you’ve just seen clips online—you’ve probably encountered this phenomenon. It can seem powerful… emotional… even mysterious.

But what does the Bible actually say about it?

That’s what we’re going to explore together today.

Before we get into scripture, I want to share a bit of my own journey.

My husband and I were part of a Pentecostal group for many years.
And yes… we both spoke and prayed in “tongues.”

So I’m not speaking about this from the outside looking in—I’ve lived it.

And over time, we began to ask deeper questions:
What is this practice?
Is it what the Bible describes?
And is it the evidence of having received the Holy Spirit?

Pentecostalism as a movement really began in the early 1900s, most notably with the Azusa Street Revival in Los Angeles.



What set Pentecostals apart from other Christian denominations was one key doctrine:
That speaking in “tongues” is the primary evidence of having received the Holy Spirit.

In many Pentecostal churches, this became the defining sign—almost the foundation of the movement.

But here’s where we need to slow down and ask an important question:

What does the word “tongues” actually mean in the Bible?

In the King James Bible, the word “tongues” simply means languages.

Not mysterious sounds.
Not unintelligible speech.
But real, understandable languages.

And we see this very clearly in the first instance of “tongues” in the New Testament.

Let’s go to Acts chapter 2.



This is the day of Pentecost. The Holy Spirit is poured out, and the apostles begin to speak in other “tongues.”

But notice what happens next:

“Every man heard them speak in his own language.” — Acts 2:6

There were Jews in Jerusalem from many different nations—Parthians, Medes, Elamites, people from Mesopotamia, Egypt, Rome…

And each one heard the message in their own language.

This is so important.

These were not random, unintelligible sounds.
These were real, known languages.

And what was the purpose?

Clarity.

“We do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.” — Acts 2:11

The miracle of tongues in Acts 2 didn’t bring confusion—it removed it.
It allowed everyone to clearly hear and understand the gospel.

The Bible also tells us that tongues were a sign for unbelievers.

We see this in Acts chapter 10, when Peter is sent to a Gentile named Cornelius.

As Peter preaches, something remarkable happens.

Cornelius and his household receive the Holy Spirit and begin praising God in “tongues.”



Now think about this.

Cornelius was a Gentile—likely speaking his native language, Italian.

And the Jewish believers who came with Peter were astonished.

Why?

Because they could understand what was being said.

And even more shocking—God had given the Holy Spirit to Gentiles.

The “tongues” in this moment were not about confusion or spectacle.
They were a clear, understandable sign confirming that God’s message was for all people.

Now let’s move to Paul’s letter to the Corinthians.

Corinth was a cosmopolitan city—people from many nations, many cultures.

So naturally, the church there would have had a mix of different native languages.

You can imagine how chaotic that could become in a gathering.



So Paul gives instruction:

“Let all things be done decently and in order.” — 1 Corinthians 14:40

He explains that if someone speaks in a tongue—that is, a foreign language—there should be an interpreter.

Why?

So that everyone can be edified.

Otherwise, only the speaker benefits, and the rest of the congregation is left confused.

Paul even says:

“If there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church.” — 1 Corinthians 14:28

That’s very clear.

The gift of tongues was a gift of languages—and for some, also the ability to interpret those languages.

Think about it this way.

I have a friend who works as a Spanish interpreter.

That’s a real gift and skill—you have to be highly competent in both languages to do that well.

In the same way, the biblical gift of tongues involved real communication, real understanding and real edification of others.

Now I want to zoom out for a moment and talk about miracles more broadly.

Throughout scripture, miracles appear at specific times for specific purposes.

During the first exodus—when Israel came out of Egypt—we see incredible signs:

The Red Sea parted.
A cloud by day.
Fire by night.
Manna from heaven.
Even their shoes didn’t wear out.




Then in the second “exodus,” during the time of Jesus, we see miracles again:

Jesus walked on water.
He healed the sick.
He multiplied loaves and fishes.



And then in the book of Acts, the apostles continue in signs and wonders.

Why?

To authenticate Jesus as the Messiah and to establish the early church.

But as we move into the epistles—Peter, Paul, James, John—we see something interesting.

The emphasis shifts.

We see very little mention of ongoing signs and wonders.

This suggests that these miraculous signs were serving a foundational purpose—and that purpose was being fulfilled.

In 1 Corinthians 13, Paul says:

“Whether there be tongues, they shall cease…” — 1 Corinthians 13:8

He explains that this would happen when “that which is perfect is come.”

The word “perfect” here can mean complete or mature.

The early church began at Pentecost, and over the course of about a generation—roughly 40 years—it grew, matured, and became established.

There’s a fascinating contrast in the Bible that ties into this.

In Genesis, at the Tower of Babel, people said:

“Let us make us a name.”



They built in their own strength, their own wisdom, apart from God.

So what did God do?

He confounded their language and scattered them abroad.

But in Acts, we see the opposite.

The church is built in God’s name, according to His will.

And instead of language causing division, the miracle of tongues brings unity.



Different people, different nations… yet one message, one Spirit, one body.

And we see this beautiful picture again in Revelation.

The New Jerusalem is described as pure gold, clear as glass.

A river flows from the throne of God, clear as crystal.

This speaks not just of purity—but of clarity.

No confusion.
No chaos.
Just truth, light, and understanding.

And the invitation is open:

“Whosoever will, let him come.”

The message is clear. The kingdom is accessible.



Now here’s where this becomes a serious issue.

In many Pentecostal circles, speaking in “tongues” is taught as the evidence of having the Holy Spirit.

But based on what we’ve seen in scripture—that claim doesn’t hold up.

Because the biblical purpose of tongues was not to prove spirituality…
It was to communicate the gospel clearly, especially across language barriers.

And again, I say this from experience.

I was part of a Pentecostal church. I spoke in “tongues.”

My husband was involved with a Hillsong sister church back in the 80s.

He saw people living one way on Saturday night…
and then speaking in “tongues” at church the next morning.

That should make us pause.

Because unintelligible, repetitive sounds are not the true evidence of the Holy Spirit.

The real evidence is a transformed life.

A holy life.

As it says in James chapter 4:

“Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye double minded… humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up.”

God does not dwell in an unclean vessel.

The mark of the Holy Spirit is not what we say in a moment—
it’s how we live every day.

So I encourage you—study this for yourself.

Go back to the scriptures.
Read Acts. Read Corinthians.
Ask questions. Seek truth.

I’d love to hear your thoughts and your experiences in the comment section below, or send me an email: crystalriver053@gmail.com

And as always—

God bless you as you study to show yourself approved.

Thursday, March 12, 2026

Was Jesus Really Punished in our Place? (Rethinking the Cross)

Why did Jesus die?

Most Christians have heard the same explanation their entire life:
“Jesus was punished by God in our place to pay the penalty for our sins.”

This idea is often called penal substitution.
And one of the theologians most responsible for popularising it was the 16th-century reformer John Calvin.

Calvin wrote:

“The guilt that held us liable for punishment has been transferred to the head of the Son of God.”
John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, 2.16.8

According to this view, God's justice demands punishment for sin.
God cannot simply forgive sin unless someone is punished.

So the argument goes like this:
Jesus stepped in, took our punishment, and paid our sin debt.

Now I’ll be honest.

I have stood directly against Calvin’s theology for years.

But recently I had to ask myself an honest question:

Why did Calvin come to that conclusion?

Is there any biblical truth behind what he was saying?

To answer that question, we need to go somewhere most Christians rarely look when discussing the cross.

We need to go to the books of the Law.


Israel’s Justice System

Under the Mosaic Law, justice was very specific.

The tribe of Levi was not given land in Canaan like the other tribes.
Instead, they were given 48 cities scattered throughout Israel.

Six of those cities were called cities of refuge.

You can read about them in Numbers 35 and Deuteronomy 19.

These cities served a very important purpose in Israel’s justice system.

If someone accidentally killed another person, they could flee to a city of refuge and receive a fair trial.

But if someone was found guilty of murder, the law required a serious consequence.

Numbers 35:33 says:

“So you shall not pollute the land wherein ye are: for blood defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it.”
Numbers 35:33

In other words:

Innocent blood polluted the land.

And the only thing that could cleanse that bloodguilt was the blood of the murderer.

If the murderer was proven guilty by two or three witnesses, he was handed over to the avenger of blood — a relative whose duty it was to execute justice.

This was Israel’s legal principle:

“A life for a life.”

It was not about revenge.

It was about purging bloodguilt from the land.


Jesus’ Warning to Jerusalem

Now fast forward to the ministry of Jesus.

In Matthew 23, Jesus confronts the religious leaders of Jerusalem.

And He makes a shocking statement.

He says:

“That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias.”
Matthew 23:35

Then He says something even more striking:

“Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.”
Matthew 23:36

Think about what Jesus was saying.

He was accusing that generation of bloodguilt.

The blood of the righteous — from Abel onward — would come upon them.

Why?

Because they were continuing the same pattern:
persecuting and killing God’s messengers.

Jesus even tells them:

“Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.”
Matthew 23:32

And historically we know what happened next.

Within forty years, Jerusalem was surrounded by Roman armies.

During the Roman-Jewish War (AD 66–70), the city was destroyed and the temple burned.

According to the historian Josephus, over a million Jews died during that catastrophe.

Jesus had predicted it.

Luke records Him saying:

“When ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh…
For these be the days of vengeance.”
Luke 21:20, 22

The language is clear.

Days of vengeance.

Justice for bloodshed.


Jesus Bore Israel’s Sin

So what role did Jesus play in this story?

Peter tells us:

“Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree.”
1 Peter 2:24

Jesus bore the sin of Israel.

He became the one treated as guilty under the law.

Why?

Because the Mosaic system required a life for a life.

And Jesus died under the law.

Paul explains this in Galatians:

“Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written,
Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.”
Galatians 3:13

Paul is quoting Deuteronomy 21:23, which said that someone executed and hung on a tree was under God’s curse.

Jesus endured that curse.

Not because the Father hated Him.

But because He fulfilled the law’s requirements.


Calvin saw this principle, and he wrote:

“Christ stood in our place and bore what we deserved.”
Institutes of the Christian Religion, 2.16

But here’s where I believe Calvin extended the idea beyond the original context.

He applied it to all humanity for all time.

Yet the scriptures consistently connect this judgment with that generation of Israel.


The End of the Law’s Curse

The Mosaic Law demanded punishment.

But the New Covenant operates differently.

Paul writes in Romans 8:2:

“For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.”

Through Jesus’ death, the covenant system that condemned Israel was fulfilled and brought to completion.

Now righteousness comes through something entirely different.

Not through law.

But through the Spirit.

Through faith like Abraham’s faith.


The Avenger of Blood

There is another fascinating connection.

In Israel’s law, justice for murder was carried out by the avenger of blood.

Now listen to what Paul says about Jesus:

“The Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God.”
2 Thessalonians 1:7–8

Who was persecuting the church Paul was writing to?

Acts 17 tells us plainly.

It was unbelieving Jews who were moved with envy.

They stirred up mobs and attacked the believers.

At the same time, the book of Revelation shows the martyrs crying out:

“How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood?”
Revelation 6:10

Eventually the answer comes.

Revelation 19 describes Christ as:

“Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire…”
Revelation 19:11&12

In other words, Jesus is not only the one who bore Israel’s sin.

He is also the ultimate avenger of righteous blood.


The True City of Refuge

There’s one final connection that is absolutely beautiful.

In Numbers 35:5 the Levitical cities were measured carefully.

They formed perfectly balanced spaces, two thousand cubits on each side.

Now look at what John sees in Revelation.

The New Jerusalem.

He writes:

“The city lieth foursquare… the length and the breadth and the height of it are equal.”
Revelation 21:16


Perfect symmetry.

Just like the cities of refuge.

Except this city is not merely physical safety.

It represents spiritual refuge.

A covenant kingdom where people find life through Christ.

In other words:

The New Jerusalem is the ultimate city of refuge.


Final Thought

So why did Jesus die?

Not because the Father needed someone to punish.

Not because God was trapped by His own justice.

But because Jesus came to fulfill the law, bear Israel’s covenantal sin, and bring the old system to its completion.

Through His blood, a new covenant was established.

A covenant not based on condemnation…

…but on the Spirit of life.

And today, anyone who walks in that Spirit enters the true city of refuge.

The kingdom of God.














Speaking in Tongues: real, fake...or Misunderstood

Today we’re going to consider something that’s deeply personal to me, also widely discussed and sometimes misunderstood…that is "speaki...